Blog Post

A Legendary Concertmaster in Hollywood

Matthias Büdinger

An Interview with Louis Kaufman by Matthias Büdinger / Photo Louis and Annette Kaufman

Originally published in Soundtrack Magazine Vol.15/No 58/1996


Text reproduced by kind permission of the editor, Luc Van de Ven and Matthias Büdinger

So much has been written about Hollywood's classic film composers from the Golden Age: Max Steiner, Alfred Newman, Bernard Herrmann, Erich Wolfgang Korngold, Victor Young, David Raksin, Franz Waxman and others. But what about the people in the orchestra, the studio musicians? Without them, the music written by these composers would fail to come alive. You can't travel just by staring at a map.


I had the extraordinary chance to get to know one of old Hollywood's foremost concertmasters at film scoring sessions: Louis Kaufman and his lovely wife Annette. Louis was one of the great American violin players of our century. He always performed and recorded pieces apart from the mainstream violin literature, for instance Sam Barber's Concerto for Violin and Orchestra. op. 14, Darius Milhaud's Second Violin Concerto (with Milhaud himself conducting), Walter Piston's Violin Concerto No. 1 (with Bernard Herrmann conducting the London Symphony Orchestra), Aaron Copland's Violin Sonata and Nocturne (with Copland at the piano).


So it was only a matter of time before Louis came to Hollywood and played his beloved instrument for all the film composers mentioned above. The list of films - altogether more than 500! - which benefitted from Kaufman's warm and spirited string performance is impressive: LAURA, SAYONARA, CLEOPATRA, THE BRIDE OF FRANKENSTEIN, REBECCA, SUSPICION, CAPTAIN BLOOD, THE SEA HAWK, CASABLANCA, PSYCHO, THE RED PONY, PINOCCHIO, GONE WITH THE WIND, WUTHERING HEIGHTS, SINCE YOU WENT AWAY, THE MAGNIFICENT AMBERSONS, THE GREATEST STORY EVER TOLD, to name just a few.


Born in Portland, Oregon, on May 10, 1905, of Romanian-Jewish parents, Louis later-made his first recordings for Thomas Edison. When he was seven years old and on his way to school, Louis heard someone playing the violin. The player became his first local teacher. Six months later Louis played better than his teacher! Before he could actually read music he got his first prize for a performance, a three dollar bill. "From then on my father was convinced I was a genius."


At age 13, Louis went to New York to study for eight years at the Institute of Musical Art (which was later absorbed by the Juilliard School). He studied with Franz Kneisel who was a friend of Johannes Brahms. Says Kaufman, "Kneisel was very harsh, very intolerant. But I had enough sense to stick to him." He graduated in 1927 and won two awards, the Loeb Prize and the Naumburg Award. After a while Louis was invited by all the great players to play with them: Mischa Elman, Jascha Heifetz, Fritz Kreisler and others. Together with his new wife Annette - they were married in 1933 - Louis started to play programs for radio stations in Portland, San Francisco, San Diego and Denver. They went to Los Angeles, and the city made the most wonderful impression on the young couple. Louis played three programs a week at KFI (NBC), earning $75.


One day MGM called, asking if he would play for Ernst Lubitsch's new film, THE MERRY WIDOW. The German director had heard one of his programs on radio. Kaufman said, "I don't know if I'm good for this commercial work. My background is very serious." - "Okay, we'll pay you double money." Louis agreed, without knowing how much the amount would be. In one week Kaufman earned 1500 dollars: "We have no choice, Annette. We've got to like this." In one year the Kaufmans saved enough money for their beautiful house in Westwood, built by Frank Lloyd Wright. In 1942, while working on THE MAGNIFICENT AMBERSONS, Louis and Annette became Bernard Herrmann's closest friends until his death in 1975. In 1948 the Kaufmans left Hollywood and went to Europe to extend their concert and recording activities. With Paris as their base they stayed in France for more than five years.


I spent an afternoon with Annette and Louis Kaufman at their home in March 1992, and I felt how close they were, with Annette being Louis' encyclopedic memory. I have rarely met people more friendly and caring than this lovely couple. When I went back to L.A. in March 1994, I was looking forward to seeing my two "old" friends again. Sadly Louis died on February 9, 1994, of congestive heart failure as a result of the big earthquake in January. He was 88 years old.


Louis, did you have any idea what Hollywood was like before you came here?

Louis Kaufman: Not at all. It was a new world. It was the Promised Land. When I came to MGM to work on Ernst Lubitsch's THE MERRY WIDOW, the conductor-composer Herbert Stothart introduced me to the orchestra, and I took my place on the first stand. Then I was very often called upon to do these solos. It wasn't too difficult. It was just long and tedious until the Union realized that it was too hard for the musicians to record sometimes way into the morning, after a full day's work. It had gone around like wildfire that I was there and played these solos. That's how we met Max Steiner, Alfred Newman, Bernard Herrmann, Franz Waxman, all those great composers.

Annette Kaufman: They were just starting out. They had a hard time trying to make producers realize that music had a certain place in a film. Essentially, when you look at a fire in a black-and-white film, - films were all black-and-white at that time - it isn't very exciting or particularly interesting with just the ordinary background sounds.


Did you appreciate film music, Louis, or did you look down your nose on this strange kind of music, in view of your classical background?

No. They were all great musicians. We had great respect. That was the Golden Age. People kept asking me, "How can you leave the world of New York and string quartets to go to this vulgar, common place called Hollywood?" - I said, "No one stops you from playing as well as you can, and the checks are always good." Hollywood was just not the sort of vision that many People have about our community. They always say rather snobbishly - perhaps in New York and Boston - that it's a cultural desert. That's all nonsense. Even when we came here for the first time, we had wonderful symphony concerts conducted by Barbirolli and Klemperer. In The Pasadena Playhouse they performed Shakespeare. So it was a wonderful atmosphere. It was a magnificent training ground for me, developing a discipline and listening to myself all the time via microphone. For instance, to play some of the modern works, it's silly to have the same approach that you have for playing Bach, Beethoven, Mendelssohn or Brahms. You have to create a different style. I could never have done some of the American material that incorporates popular idioms and even jazz with just a straightforward classic or romantic approach. It was challenging to evolve a style that would fit this modern material. Also, it was through Hollywood that I met some of the most important composers that I was able to work with: Aaron Copland, Darius Milhaud, Robert Russell Bennett, Ernst Toch, Bernard Herrmann. So I will always be thankful to Hollywood.


Let's talk about some of these wonderful musicians. Did you work with Max Steiner?

He had a wonderful melodic and harmonic gift. One of the most impressive examples of what music can do in the hands of a master like Steiner is OF HUMAN BONDAGE. I still remember the material. It sticks to your ribs. First they had just temporary tracks. The preview was disastrous. The audience was laughing all the time. The producers thought their investment was going down. In a panic they called Max Steiner who wrote a masterly score in something of a hurry. Then the audience laughed and cried at the right time.

Max called us up one Sunday morning, "Come over with your violin. I'm arranging the material for GONE WITH THE WIND. The piano might be a little dry for Selznick." Selznick was very fussy and a perfectionist in every detail, including music, which he knew very little about. Our presentation of Max's themes was submitted to Selznick who accepted the whole thing very enthusiastically.


Producers-directors on the one hand, film composers on the other hand, that's always a funny and sometimes a disastrous relationship.

Rudolph Polk wanted to help Ernst Toch to earn some money here. So he introduced him to Josef von Sternberg who was a very fine director but didn't know much about music. Von Sternberg walked to the piano when Toch was first introduced to him and played a middle C. He said, "This is the note I want you to use in your score." Toch just turned on his heel and walked out. He said, "I can't work with an idiot like that."

Ernst Toch worked on THE HUNCHBACK OF NOTRE DAME at RKO. Newman conducted the score. For a scene when Charles Laughton as the hunchback is seen climbing up Notre Dame, Toch wrote a fugal treatment of his theme. It was a ten to fifteen-minute cue. We needed one day to record this. But Laughton refused the music since his grunts of effort couldn't be heard! So they had no music at all, which killed the excitement of the long climb.


You worked for Sam Goldwyn as well.

Yes. He made a picture called WE LIVE AGAIN (1934). It was based on Tolstoy's book "Resurrection". They had a Russian chorus and a Russian singer. Alfred Newman did a wonderful job with the orchestra. The sound-man was very upset at the time, because his wife was having a baby in the hospital. He was calling the hospital every few minutes to find out how she was, and he forgot to rewind the recording. Then Mr. Goldwyn heard it all backwards. The musicians in the orchestra didn't say a word. Goldwyn kept saying, "I never heard anything like it. It is absolutely great."


Did the composers or the conductors tell you anything about the movie in order to get the right feeling for the scenes?

No, it was sort of blind. We had plenty of time to get to see some sort of episodes, but the film was never shown to us in total. Generally speaking, the film industry was miles ahead of the recording industry. Newman was a special expert on sound. He knew exactly where to put the microphones. He was paying special attention to the strings because Al realized that they sound more human than woodwinds or horns.


What is the mystery behind the extra-ordinary and legendary "Newman string sound"?

It's a little bit like cooking. Annette sometimes cooks very delicious dishes that astonish our friends. She writes down the ingredients, but they never come out quite the same. Art essentially is a mystery, and it should be a mystery. There is no reason why it has to come down to common sense or to the fact that two and two make four. Sometimes two and two make four million. It depends on your point of view. Newman chose the musicians very carefully.

Annette: Max Steiner wasn't that dependent on individual players. He thought more in orchestral, symphonic terms. He didn't depend on that kind of super-performance.

Louis: Nevertheless, they were all unique in their ways. No one ever gave us the music ahead of time to look at. They weren't ready. They had to work in a panic, copy at the last moment, record at the last moment.
Annette: The orchestrators were exceptional musicians.
Louis: They had to be. Max Steiner could orchestrate better than anybody else, but he just didn't have the time. It's incredible what fine work was able to be done by these specialists under pressure. I never could understand it.

 
One exception regarding orchestration was Bernard Herrmann.

Yes. He insisted upon enough time to write and orchestrate every tiny detail by himself. Producers didn't like him because he got that much extra money. Orchestrators didn't like him because he took a lot of work away from them. We got to know him very well. In this house we had many educated discussions about art, English literature and many more topics. As a matter of fact, we exchanged residences occasionally. So Bernard Herrmann lived here twice. (Matthias is now busily kissing the carpet). He gave us his apartment in New York. In this house he wrote ANNA AND THE KING OF SIAM. He was inspired by our home because we had some Buddhas from Thailand and Cambodia.

Annette: In THE DEVIL AND DANIEL WEBSTER Herrmann did a very interesting trick with Louis' solos. He sort of re-recorded them so that it sounded like three or four violins. He loved all kinds of obscure composers. He had a very inventive mind. His struggle was that he couldn't bear stupid people. If he'd be at a party with people that bored him, he wouldn't talk to them. He rather would get a book and read. So he had a hard time in Hollywood. He was in the wrong milieu here. He was all right in England where they accept eccentric people. As a matter of fact, he had his biggest public success as a conductor in England.


You worked a lot with Alfred Newman: DODSWORTH, WUTHERING HEIGHTS, THE DIARY OF ANNE FRANK, THE GREATEST STORY EVER TOLD, among many more.

 
In WUTHERING HEIGHTS I had violin solos from beginning to end. Newman paid me three times. He loved chamber music. Very often we played chamber music in his home. He was studying at that time with Schönberg. Schönberg asked me to prepare "Verklärte Nacht" (Transfigured Night op. 4), that marvellous early string sextet. So I rehearsed carefully with my friends. We had a very nice party and played it for Schönberg. We thought we were doing it pretty correctly. I was astonished when Schönberg said, "Kaufman, it was all right, but let yourself go, play it much more romantically." 

Annette: When you did MODERN TIMES with Chaplin who used to make up his own tunes, he wanted Mickey-Mouse music for laughs in the scene where Chaplin is telling the girl what their future life would be like. Alfred Newman said, "No Mr. Chaplin, you'll spoil the dream. It's really a dream." So Newman put Louis behind a screen with a microphone by himself and his muted violin. The orchestra played without a mute. They recorded a lyric passage, and the music kept the dream going. That was much more moving.


Did you ever get a credit in any movie?

Annette: In FOR WHOM THE BELL TOLLS Louis' name was on the record. That was the first motion picture score to put on records (in January 1950).

Louis: Victor Young said to me, "Tonight we're gonna record this score." I didn't have my best violin with me, but I had a good one that was adequate for what we had to do. Actually, the processors at that time weren't sharp enough. Sometimes it was just as well to have an instrument that gave you the color you wanted without these very fine sonorities which were very mysterious and not always easy to capture with the microphone.


Did you have to use click tracks?

Click tracks were very good for a while for making sure that they got the right tempo for chases and other scenes. But they got to be a little bit too mechanical. So the good composers abandoned it then to give it a human leeway. Sometimes too much electronics begins to get in the way of what you want to project in the music itself.


I'm assuming that the film orchestras were so good that you didn't need much time for rehearsals and takes.

Sometimes the very first take that you do after the rehearsal is the very best. You may miss a few little details here and there that you'd like to correct, but it's like a fat lady in a corset: you correct one thing, and then something else sticks out. You begin to lose some of the living spontaneity. What I began to learn from Hollywood was that you have to be very careful. You cannot permit yourself the liberty that you have in a big concert hall with air space which acts as a wonderful filter. If you are right next to the microphone, you don't have that space, so you must learn how to project the feeling or intensity you want, but be very careful because if you use a little bit too much pressure, the tone begins to be harsh and scratchy. That was also a magnificent discipline for me.


One never ceases to learn and to develop his craft.

That's right. I had the most marvellous development because here I was as a youngster, having a chance to play chamber music with some of the greatest people. Jascha Heifetz, for instance, was wonderful to play with. Essentially he was very simple. It was very easy to follow him. He never exaggerated or tried to be too sentimental, dragging the tempos. When he would take fast tempi, it was hard to keep up with him. Even when he was reading something for the first time, he was like a cat that landed on its four legs. He never missed anything. He was miraculous.

Annette: Matthias, you see, Louis' life was the violin.

Louis: I was honestly not at all interested in anything else. I thought it was fascinating to learn how to play this little instrument, but as you get older your interests expand into other areas of art. We can all learn something through art, you have to know your instrument, you have to know your craft, naturally, but nevertheless you have to try to widen your intellectual horizons. To quote King Lear, "Nothing comes from nothing."


Do you still play the violin?

No, I retired in 1984 due to an eye operation and a slight accident to my thumb. It's a paradox, these artists that insist upon playing or singing to the very end - long after they have seen their best time - usually get their highest fees. I wasn't altogether satisfied when I made my last recordings. When you have to struggle doing some of the simple things that come naturally, like a bird sings, that was the time for me to retire.

So since then I haven't played. But Annette and I have been much busier since then than before. We have so many interests. We have never been bored. We go to concerts, and Annette is writing my biography. (After Louis died Annette continued writing the biography, but it became more difficult for her - MB) Having lived through this whole crazy century, how do you see today's film business? Today you have either murder stories and the many different ways people can be assassinated, or you have car chases and cars that are piling up. Here you don't need any symphonic developments. That's redundant. You can do all that electronically. For the audience it's just as effective. The level of material on TV is not very high. The lower the level gets, the more money they can make.


You can really be very content with the life you've led...

Louis: I'm in a situation where everybody is a junior for me. God always seemed to smile on us.

Annette: Louis always said, "You can create good habits as well as bad habits. Why not adopt good ones?" He never smoked. Alfred Newman, an incessant smoker, died many years ahead of his time.

Louis: The only danger with my music is killing people through boredom. That's the only punishment I can mete out to people.


A Fiddler's Tale

How Hollywood and Vivaldi Discovered Me

Louis Kaufman with Annette Kaufman

Foreword by Jim Svejda


A Fiddler's Tale stands as a testament to a life filled with music and art, good friends, travel, and hard work. It is a richly detailed tapestry, accompanied by a music CD containing Kaufman's recording of Vivaldi's Concerto No. 2, Op. 9 and other pieces mentioned in the book. Together they make quite a package, and all this reader can say is, some fiddler, some tale!—James Keough, Strings, October 2003


Louis Kaufman (1905–1994) was probably the most-recorded violinist in history, with recordings of more than one hundred major concert works and hundreds of film soundtracks to his credit.

Annette Kaufman (1914–2016), a pianist, shared Louis' passion for music, art, and theater as they traveled the globe on performance tours. She carried forward their joint vision in the completion of this book and in her support for the arts.

by Quentin Billard 30 May 2024
INTRADA RECORDS Time: 29/40 - Tracks: 15 _____________________________________________________________________________ Polar mineur à petit budget datant de 1959 et réalisé par Irving Lerner, « City of Fear » met en scène Vince Edwards dans le rôle de Vince Ryker, un détenu qui s’est évadé de prison avec un complice en emportant avec lui un conteneur cylindrique, croyant contenir de l’héroïne. Mais ce que Vince ignore, c’est que le conteneur contient en réalité du cobalt-60, un matériau radioactif extrêmement dangereux, capable de raser une ville entière. Ryker se réfugie alors dans une chambre d’hôtel à Los Angeles et retrouve à l’occasion sa fiancée, tandis que le détenu est traqué par la police, qui va tout faire pour retrouver Ryker et intercepter le produit radioactif avant qu’il ne soit trop tard. Le scénario du film reste donc très convenu et rappelle certains polars de l’époque (on pense par exemple à « Panic in the Streets » d’Elia Kazan en 1950, sur un scénario assez similaire), mais l’arrivée d’une intrigue en rapport avec la menace de la radioactivité est assez nouvelle pour l’époque et inspirera d’autres polars par la suite (cf. « The Satan Bug » de John Sturges en 1965). Le film repose sur un montage sobre et un rythme assez lent, chose curieuse pour une histoire de course contre la montre et de traque policière. A vrai dire, le manque de rythme et l’allure modérée des péripéties empêchent le film de décoller vraiment : Vince Edwards se voit confier ici un rôle solide, avec un personnage principal dont la santé ne cessera de se dégrader tout au long du film, subissant la radioactivité mortelle de son conteneur qu’il croit contenir de l’héroïne. Autour de lui, quelques personnages secondaires sans grand relief et toute une armada de policiers sérieux et stressés, bien déterminés à retrouver l’évadé et à récupérer le cobalt-60. Malgré l’interprétation convaincante de Vince Edwards (connu pour son rôle dans « Murder by Contract ») et quelques décors urbains réussis – le tout servi par une atmosphère de paranoïa typique du cinéma américain en pleine guerre froide - « City of Fear » déçoit par son manque de moyen et d’ambition, et échoue finalement à susciter le moindre suspense ou la moindre tension : la faute à une mise en scène réaliste, ultra sobre mais sans grande conviction, impersonnelle et peu convaincante, un comble pour un polar de ce genre qui tente de suivre la mode des films noirs américains de l’époque, mais sans réelle passion. Voilà donc une série-B poussiéreuse qui semble être très rapidement tombée dans l’oubli, si l’on excepte une récente réédition dans un coffret DVD consacré aux films noirs des années 50 produits par Columbia Pictures. Le jeune Jerry Goldsmith signa avec « City of Fear » sa deuxième partition musicale pour un long-métrage hollywoodien en 1959, après le western « Black Patch » en 1957. Le jeune musicien, alors âgé de 30 ans, avait à son actif toute une série de partitions écrites pour la télévision, et plus particulièrement pour la CBS, avec laquelle il travailla pendant plusieurs années. Si « City of Fear » fait indiscutablement partie des oeuvres de jeunesse oubliées du maestro, cela n’en demeure pas moins une étape importante dans la jeune carrière du compositeur à la fin des années 50 : le film d’Irving Lerner lui permit de s’attaquer pour la première fois au genre du thriller/polar au cinéma, genre dans lequel il deviendra une référence incontournable pour les décennies à venir. Pour Jerry Goldsmith, le challenge était double sur « City of Fear » : il fallait à la fois évoquer le suspense haletant du film sous la forme d’un compte à rebours, tout en évoquant la menace constante du cobalt-60, véritable anti-héros du film qui devient quasiment une sorte de personnage à part entière – tout en étant associé à Vince Edwards tout au long du récit. Pour Goldsmith, un premier choix s’imposa : celui de l’orchestration. Habitué à travailler pour la CBS avec des formations réduites, le maestro fit appel à un orchestre sans violons ni altos, mais avec tout un pupitre de percussions assez éclectique : xylophone, piano, marimba, harpe, cloches, vibraphone, timbales, caisse claire, glockenspiel, bongos, etc. Le pupitre des cuivres reste aussi très présent et assez imposant, tout comme celui des bois. Les cordes se résument finalement aux registres les plus graves, à travers l’utilisation quasi exclusive des violoncelles et des contrebasses. Dès les premières notes de la musique (« Get Away/Main Title »), Goldsmith établit sans équivoque une sombre atmosphère de poursuite et de danger, à travers une musique agitée, tendue et mouvementée. Alors que l’on aperçoit Ryker et son complice en train de s’échapper à toute vitesse en voiture, Goldsmith introduit une figure rythmique ascendante des cuivres, sur fond de rythmes complexes évoquant tout aussi bien Stravinsky que Bartok – deux influences majeures chez le maestro américain. On notera ici l’utilisation caractéristique du xylophone et des bongos, deux instruments qui seront très présents tout au long du score de « City of Fear », tandis que le piano renforce la tension par ses ponctuations de notes graves sur fond d’harmonies menaçantes des bois et des cuivres : une mélodie se dessine alors lentement au piccolo et au glockenspiel, et qui deviendra très rapidement le thème principal du score, thème empreint d’un certain mystère, tout en annonçant la menace à venir. C’est à partir de « Road Block » que Goldsmith introduit les sonorités associées dans le film à Ryker : on retrouve ici le jeu particulier des percussions (notes rapides de xylophone, ponctuation de piano/timbales) tandis qu’une trompette soliste fait ici son apparition, instrument rattaché dans le film à Ryker. La trompette revient dans « Motel », dans lequel les bongos créent ici un sentiment d’urgence sur fond de ponctuations de trombones et de timbales. Le morceau reflète parfaitement l’ambiance de paranoïa et de tension psychologique du film, tandis que les harmonies sombres du début sont reprises dans « The Facts », pour évoquer la menace du cobalt-60. Ce morceau permet alors à Jerry Goldsmith de développer les sonorités associées à la substance toxique dans le film (un peu comme il le fera quelques années plus tard dans le film « The Satan Bug » en 1965), par le biais de ponctuations de trompettes en sourdine, de percussion métallique et d’un raclement de guiro, évoquant judicieusement le contenant métallique du cobalt-60, que transporte Ryker tout au long du film (croyant à tort qu’il contient de la drogue). « Montage #1 » est quand à lui un premier morceau-clé de la partition de « City of Fear », car le morceau introduit les sonorités associées aux policiers qui traquent le fugitif tout au long du film. Goldsmith met ici l’accent sur un ostinato quasi guerrier de timbales agressives sur fond de cuivres en sourdine, de bois aigus et de caisse claire quasi martial : le morceau possède d’ailleurs un côté militaire assez impressionnant, évoquant les forces policières et l’urgence de la situation : stopper le fugitif à tout prix. Le réalisateur offre même une séquence de montage illustrant les préparatifs de la police pour le début de la course poursuite dans toute la ville, ce qui permet au maestro de s’exprimer pleinement en musique avec « Montage #1 ». Plus particulier, « Tennis Shoes » introduit du jazz traditionnel pour le côté « polar » du film (à noter que le pianiste du score n’est autre que le jeune John Williams !). Le morceau est associé dans le film au personnage de Pete Hallon (Sherwood Price), le gangster complice de Ryker que ce dernier finira par assassiner à la suite de plusieurs maladresses. Le motif jazzy d’Hallon revient ensuite dans « The Shoes » et « Montage #2 », qui reprend le même sentiment d’urgence que la première séquence de montage policier, avec le retour ici du motif descendant rapide de 7 notes qui introduisait le film au tout début de « Get Away/Main Title ». La mélodie principale de piccolo sur fond d’harmonies sombres de bois reviennent enfin dans « You Can’t Stay », rappelant encore une fois la menace du cobalt-60, avec une opposition étonnante ici entre le registre très aigu de la mélodie et l’extrême grave des harmonies, un élément qui renforce davantage la tension dans la musique du film. Le morceau développe ensuite le thème principal pour les dernières secondes du morceau, reprenant une bonne partie du « Main Title ». La tension monte ensuite d’un cran dans le sombre et agité « Taxicab », reprenant les ponctuations métalliques et agressives associées au cobalt-60 (avec son effet particulier du raclement de guiro cubain), tout comme le sombre « Waiting » ou l’oppressant « Search » et son écriture torturée de cordes évoquant la dégradation physique et mentale de Ryker, contaminé par le cobalt-60. « Search » permet au compositeur de mélanger les sonorités métalliques de la substance toxique, la trompette « polar » de Ryker et les harmonies sombres et torturées du « Main Title », aboutissant aux rythmes de bongos/xylophone syncopés complexes de « Track Down » et au climax brutal de « End of the Road » avec sa série de notes staccatos complexes de trompettes et contrebasses. La tension orchestrale de « End of the Road » aboutit finalement à la coda agressive de « Finale », dans lequel Goldsmith résume ses principales idées sonores/thématiques/instrumentales de sa partition en moins de 2 minutes pour la conclusion du film – on retrouve ainsi le motif descendant du « Main Title », le thème principal, le motif métallique et le raclement de guiro du cobalt-60 – un final somme toute assez sombre et élégiaque, typique de Goldsmith. Vous l’aurez certainement compris, « City of Fear » possède déjà les principaux atouts du style Jerry Goldsmith, bien plus reconnaissable ici que dans son premier essai de 1957, « Black Patch ». La musique de « City of Fear » reste d'ailleurs le meilleur élément du long-métrage un peu pauvre d'Irving Lerner : aux images sèches et peu inspirantes du film, Goldsmith répond par une musique sombre, complexe, virile, nerveuse et oppressante. Le musicien met en avant tout au long du film d’Irving Lerner une instrumentation personnelle, mélangeant les influences du XXe siècle (Stravinsky, Bartok, etc.) avec une inventivité et une modernité déconcertante - on est déjà en plein dans le style suspense du Goldsmith des années 60/70. Goldsmith fit partie à cette époque d’une nouvelle génération de musiciens qui apportèrent un point de vue différent et rafraîchissant à la musique de film hollywoodienne (Bernard Herrmann ayant déjà ouvert la voie à cette nouvelle conception) : là où un Steiner ou un Newman aurait proposé une musique purement jazzy ou même inspirée du Romantisme allemand, Goldsmith ira davantage vers la musique extra européenne tout en bousculant l’orchestre hollywoodien traditionnel et en s’affranchissant des figures rythmiques classiques, mélodiques et harmoniques du Golden Age hollywoodien. Sans être un chef-d’oeuvre dans son genre, « City of Fear » reste malgré tout un premier score majeur dans les musiques de jeunesse de Jerry Goldsmith : cette partition, pas si anecdotique qu’elle en a l’air au premier abord, servira de pont vers de futures partitions telles que « The Prize » et surtout « The Satan Bug ». « City of Fear » permit ainsi à Goldsmith de concrétiser ses idées qu’il développa tout au long de ses années à la CBS, et les amplifia sur le film d’Iriving Lerner à l’échelle cinématographique, annonçant déjà certaines de ses futures grandes musiques d’action/suspense pour les décennies à venir – les recettes du style Goldsmith sont déjà là : rythmes syncopés complexes, orchestrations inventives, développements thématiques riches, travail passionné sur la relation image/musique, etc. Voilà donc une musique rare et un peu oubliée du maestro californien, à redécouvrir rapidement grâce à l’excellente édition CD publiée par Intrada, qui contient l’intégralité des 29 minutes écrites par Goldsmith pour « City of Fear », le tout servi par un son tout à fait honorable pour un enregistrement de 1959 ! 
by Quentin Billard 24 May 2024
Essential scores - Jerry Goldsmith
Share by: