Blog Post

An Interview with Leonard Salzedo

Randall D. Larson

Originally published in Soundtrack Magazine Vol.20/No.54, 1995

Text reproduced by kind permission of the editor, Luc Van de Ven and Randall D. Larson

Leonard Salzedo is perhaps best known for scoring one of Hammer Films’ seminal horror pictures, THE REVENGE OF FRANKENSTEIN (1957). His output for British films, in fact, reached nearly twenty, and he has composed more than one hundred fifty concert pieces, ranging from concertos to ballets, voice and piano works, brass ensembles to percussion music. Several of his pieces have premiered in the USA, including a 1993 performance of his ‘Four Antiphones’ at the Music with Percussion Group at the University of Wisconsin / Milwaukee. Now in his 73rd year, Salzedo is still active musically. He completed six new works in 1993 alone. Salzedo’s String Quartet No. 7 was recently performed in the U.K. at Cambridge, in a concert in celebration of the 50th Anniversary of the formation of the Composer’s Guide of Great Britain. Interviewed in May, 1993, and again in August, 1994, Mr. Salzedo described his thoughts on film scoring and his experienced composing for motion pictures. The author is grateful to the kind assistance of Ms. Claire Mitchell at PRS for arranging contact with Mr. Salzedo.


What is your background in music?


My career as a professional composer began in 1944 when my 2nd String Quartet was performed at a concert of contemporary music in January of that year. In the audience was Marie Rambert who immediately asked me to write a score for a new ballet which she was producing with her company. This was The Fugitive and was very successful, receiving some 400 performances during the next six years, mostly in the U.K. but also in Belgium, Australia and New Zealand. Since then I have written another 16 ballet scores and almost made various arrangements and orchestrations for different ballet companies. I have also done quite a lot of conducting for ballet, quite often of my own music.


How did you become involved in film scoring?


I had been very interested in the possibility of writing for films and in the spring of 1954 I asked my friend Malcolm Arnold (we had been students together) if he could help me get a commission. He immediately put me in touch with (music director) John Hollingsworth who asked me to write the music for THE STRANGER CAME HOME, a Hammer thriller starring Paulette Godard and William Sylvester.


That was directed by Terence Fisher, who went on to become Hammer’s greatest horror director. How closely did you work with him on the music?


The only time I met Terence Fisher was when we saw the film through for the first time. After that I worked very closely with John Hollingsworth. Michael Carreras, the producer, came to the recording sessions, but this seemed merely to make sure that everything was satisfactory from the music point of view. This was the case in all six feature films which I wrote for Hammer: it was the producer and not the director with whom I came into contact.


What is your view of the purpose of film music? How do you try to achieve that purpose in your own music, utilizing your own style?


The purpose of film music should be to enhance the dramatic effect of the film. It came as a follow up to incidental music to plays. However, while a lot of the music written in the past for the theater is very good and can exist in the concert hall in its own right, this cannot be said for much film music. This came about because of the possibility of having music during dramatic scenes and during dialog and of course especially in love scenes. And with the ability to synchronize it precisely with the film, it took on a different function. I think that much of the film music written since the “talkies” started back in the 1920s is little more than padding to boost rather bad scenes. I know myself that sometimes the scene for which I had to write some background music did not suggest anything in particular musically. I simply had to produce a rather negative musical noise. I think that a very small percentage of what I have written for the cinema has any musical value in its own right. To listen to it away from the film would be rather boring. I go quite regularly to the cinema and I find that a lot of the music seems to be somewhat superfluous and very often too loud. I remember many years ago a French film called UN CARNET DU BAL, which used a waltz tune very quietly in the background; this was extremely effective and produced a great atmosphere of nostalgia.


What influences have you found significant in your film music composition?


I have always been a regular film goer and always listened very carefully to the music. Also from 1950 onwards, when I was a member of the Royal Philharmonic Orchestra, I played in many film sessions; which gave me an insight into how it was done. My influences were Prokofiev, Walton, Vaughan Williams and Leonard Bernstein. Although of these the only one I played in the studio was Walton. Much of the music I played in the studio seemed to me to be very second rate as music, but I must say, at the same time, that much of it was very effective and certainly fulfilled its purpose.


When you first see a film, prior to scoring it, what impressions do you get, musically? How do you decide what type of music to use, and when?


When I first see a film, I do not always get any particular impressions of what kind of music I will write. That comes later when I sit down with the cue sheet. As far as “when” is concerned, this is a matter of discussion with the director. Sometimes this is obvious but not always. Very often the director might have very precise ideas of when there should be music and what kind, and of course this often makes my job easier.


John Hollingsworth was Hammer’s music director during their formulative years in the adventure, mystery and horror genres. How did you find working with him?


Obviously, Hammer had great faith and trust in John Hollingsworth and I worked very closely with him, going over my sketches on the piano before making the final orchestration. The only film for which this did not happen was THE REVENGE OF FRANKENSTEIN, because just after we had seen the film through and decided on the music sections, John became very ill with tuberculosis and Muir Mathieson took over and conducted the sessions.


What was your musical approach toward these early Hammer films? What kind of music did they require, and what elements did you accentuate with your music?


I did not have any particular music style but simply took each film as it came and wrote what seemed appropriate. As to the question of what they required, I think that Hammer trusted each composer to produce something suitable. Most of the films I wrote for them were serious and fairly dramatic and it was this I tried to emphasize.


What sort of orchestration did you use on these scores? How large of an orchestra was available to you?


The size of the orchestra was dictated partly by how much Hammer wanted to spend on the music and how many musicians they would get into the recording studio. We mostly used Anvil Studios where the music recording was not too big and we used a medium sized orchestra: 2 flutes (piccolo), oboe (cor anglais), 2 clarinets (bass clarinet), bassoon, 2 horns, 2 trumpets, 2 trombones, timpani, percussion, harp and strings (about 14).


I’m especially fond of your score for REVENGE OF FRANKENSTEIN. The subtle interplay between the themes for Karl and the Monster – especially as the two merge into one – was highly effective…


For THE REVENGE OF FRANKENSTEIN we used the A.B.P.C. Studios at Elstree. As this was a larger studio we used a slightly larger orchestra. The same wind, brass and percussion but more strings. It’s been so long since I’ve seen it that I’ve largely forgotten what I wrote! I do remember that most of the music was atonal using a sequence of eight notes in different ways. I wanted to get away from certain musical clichés which had become associated with music scores for horror films: muted brass and tremolo strings! It has been the most successful film score which I have written and still brings in some royalties after all this time.


What kind of music did you write for your other Hammer films, which were mostly dramas and mystery pictures?


For THE STRANGER CAME HOME, my first film, I used mainly dramatic music with more romantic interludes as required. I remember that I had a special sequence for the scenes where William Sylvester had amnesia, with high strings, low clarinet and a vibraphone. Also a special section for strings and percussion only for the night time scene by the lake. I have since used an adaptation of this scene in a chamber work, my Partita for Percussion and String Quartet.



THE MASK OF DUST was very straightforward, mostly romantic with more dramatic sections. Quiet strings for the church scene, a march at the race track. I used a slightly jazzy section for the hotel lobby. One of Liszt’s consolations is played on the piano at one point in the film, and I used that also in some of the other segments.


THE GLASS CAGE had a more “circussy” atmosphere and I wrote a special sequence to underline that and also a little waltz section.



WOMEN WITHOUT MEN (called BLONDE BAIT in the USA) was mainly dramatic as there were scenes in jail. I remember that I used a timpani beat in the Main Titles to give a foreboding atmosphere.
 The score for THE STEEL BAYONET used a similar technique to that of FRANKENSTEIN but with a different atmosphere to suggest the hot, dry desert conditions. More recently I wrote a score for the HAMMER HOUSE OF HORRORS television series, but this was less satisfactory as insufficient time was allowed for the recording.


How did you enjoy working at Hammer? Was the studio supportive of its musicians and composers? The studio certainly elevated horror film music to new and spectacular heights. What was it like to work there?

 I enjoyed working at Hammer very much. The studio was certainly very supportive at all times. They certainly elevated the horror film. I remember Anthony Hinds saying to me that they made X THE UNKNOWN without expecting it to do very much but it was so successful that they did many more horror films and never looked back. Also they gave many young composers like myself the opportunity to write interesting scores.


Hammer occasionally re-used some of their scores, though not to the extent that American studios like Universal did. For example, some of your music was recycled in a scene on THE CURSE OF THE WEREWOLF, which Benjamin Frankel scored. Can you enlighten me on this evidently infrequent practice?


I am aware of the fact that Hammer borrowed a section of my music for THE REVENGE OF FRANKENSTEIN and used it in THE CURSE OF THE WEREWOLF. This also happened to me on another occasion when 20th Century Fox took some of my music from SEA WIFE and used it in ISLAND IN THE SUN. I first became aware of these facts when I received my statements from the Performing Right Society (our equivalent of ASCAP) and unfamiliar titles were included. I do not know how widespread this practice is but I am sure that it has happened on many occasions.


Speaking of SEA WIFE, what sort of musical approach were you taking on this film?


With SEA WIFE I had a slightly different situation that normal. This was for two reasons. Firstly, they had a tune by Tolchard Evans which they wanted as a theme throughout the film; and secondly I wrote the music in collaboration with Kenneth Jones. We worked out in advance exactly who would write each section and of course having a tune sometimes made my job much easier, even using it for one section when one of the characters is attacked by a shark! I did the Main Titles and End Titles for that film; in the Main Titles we used a small choir and a singer with the tune.


Several of your scores have been for documentary films. What sort of music did these films require? How would you contrast their needs with the more dramatic needs of the Hammer films?


Writing music for a documentary film can be very different for a feature. Very often it gives the opportunity for more interesting textures, especially when you have something like a close-up of insects. Also, sometimes with shots of ethnic interest you can use or imitate local music. With these sorts of films I often used a much smaller group of instruments than a feature film, and it was more like writing chamber music.


You’ve written many different types of music for many different mediums – the concert hall, the theater, and film. How do you contrast your film music with that for other mediums? What rewards do you find in scoring for films and television?


I mentioned earlier that, very often, what I write for the cinema has little or no value in the concert hall and requires a different approach from other music. However, this does not mean that it is less interesting to write. It serves a precise function and requires one’s full professional technique in order to be successful. Of course the other factor in writing film music is that usually it has to be done quickly. I do not know whether this might have an effect on the quality of the music, but I think not. Certainly one thing I found very helpful was hearing the music so soon after it had been written. This certainly helped me in learning how to use an orchestra. So often with my other music I have to wait so long before there is a performance.
One other difference between writing film music and any other kind is that film music has to be precisely timed. If I am writing a concert piece and I want it to last four minutes, it does not really matter if it is a few seconds shorter or longer. With film music, however, every section has to be exactly the right number of seconds and must contain within it several “synch points” which must happen at the exact moment of some action on the screen. In the theater, you also need to time each section, but not quite so precisely. Also in incidental music for plays I have had to write songs, which has never happened with a film.


Your film scores encompassed 17 films from 1954-1961. What brought you back in 1980 to score the Hammer TV episode, THE SILENT SCREAM?


In 1980, Hammer was making their horror series and wanted to have a signature tune for the whole series but music for each one by a different composer. Sections were written by John McCabe, Paul Patterson, Wilfred Josephs and others, including myself. I happened to be a friend of Phil Martell, who was Hammer’s music director at that time, and he asked me to do THE SILENT SCREAM. Sadly, he died earlier this year.


How did scoring this TV episode contrast with your feature film scores? What differences in musical and recording techniques did you find after 20 years?


The orchestra for THE SILENT SCREAM was slightly smaller than before, but also used a synthesizer, which was not known in the 1950s. Of course, there was one big advance in the 1950s and that was the introduction of stereo sound. MGM had their three-track system, which was used in SEA WIFE and with an orchestra of 40 plus a small choir and singer in the main titles, made a very good sound. Also, the actual quality of recording has improved greatly in the intervening years so that the sound is very much better.


What is your opinion of current film music today? Would you consider scoring films again?


Much of the film music today is very good. I thought that the score for SCHINDLER’S LIST was very good, as was the piano music by Michael Nyman for THE PIANO. But as I said earlier, some of it is too loud; it intrudes where it should be in the background. I would certainly be willing to write another film score today if asked. But I will not actively seek a commission. I have had several performances this year and fairly regular commissions during the last few years.


Randall D. Larson - Film music columnist for buysoundtrax.com and author of nearly 300 soundtrack album notes and several books on film music, including a newly-released second edition of Musique Fantastique: 100 Years of Science Fiction, Fantasy & Horror Film Music, from which this article has been extracted and modified.
by Quentin Billard 30 May, 2024
INTRADA RECORDS Time: 29/40 - Tracks: 15 _____________________________________________________________________________ Polar mineur à petit budget datant de 1959 et réalisé par Irving Lerner, « City of Fear » met en scène Vince Edwards dans le rôle de Vince Ryker, un détenu qui s’est évadé de prison avec un complice en emportant avec lui un conteneur cylindrique, croyant contenir de l’héroïne. Mais ce que Vince ignore, c’est que le conteneur contient en réalité du cobalt-60, un matériau radioactif extrêmement dangereux, capable de raser une ville entière. Ryker se réfugie alors dans une chambre d’hôtel à Los Angeles et retrouve à l’occasion sa fiancée, tandis que le détenu est traqué par la police, qui va tout faire pour retrouver Ryker et intercepter le produit radioactif avant qu’il ne soit trop tard. Le scénario du film reste donc très convenu et rappelle certains polars de l’époque (on pense par exemple à « Panic in the Streets » d’Elia Kazan en 1950, sur un scénario assez similaire), mais l’arrivée d’une intrigue en rapport avec la menace de la radioactivité est assez nouvelle pour l’époque et inspirera d’autres polars par la suite (cf. « The Satan Bug » de John Sturges en 1965). Le film repose sur un montage sobre et un rythme assez lent, chose curieuse pour une histoire de course contre la montre et de traque policière. A vrai dire, le manque de rythme et l’allure modérée des péripéties empêchent le film de décoller vraiment : Vince Edwards se voit confier ici un rôle solide, avec un personnage principal dont la santé ne cessera de se dégrader tout au long du film, subissant la radioactivité mortelle de son conteneur qu’il croit contenir de l’héroïne. Autour de lui, quelques personnages secondaires sans grand relief et toute une armada de policiers sérieux et stressés, bien déterminés à retrouver l’évadé et à récupérer le cobalt-60. Malgré l’interprétation convaincante de Vince Edwards (connu pour son rôle dans « Murder by Contract ») et quelques décors urbains réussis – le tout servi par une atmosphère de paranoïa typique du cinéma américain en pleine guerre froide - « City of Fear » déçoit par son manque de moyen et d’ambition, et échoue finalement à susciter le moindre suspense ou la moindre tension : la faute à une mise en scène réaliste, ultra sobre mais sans grande conviction, impersonnelle et peu convaincante, un comble pour un polar de ce genre qui tente de suivre la mode des films noirs américains de l’époque, mais sans réelle passion. Voilà donc une série-B poussiéreuse qui semble être très rapidement tombée dans l’oubli, si l’on excepte une récente réédition dans un coffret DVD consacré aux films noirs des années 50 produits par Columbia Pictures. Le jeune Jerry Goldsmith signa avec « City of Fear » sa deuxième partition musicale pour un long-métrage hollywoodien en 1959, après le western « Black Patch » en 1957. Le jeune musicien, alors âgé de 30 ans, avait à son actif toute une série de partitions écrites pour la télévision, et plus particulièrement pour la CBS, avec laquelle il travailla pendant plusieurs années. Si « City of Fear » fait indiscutablement partie des oeuvres de jeunesse oubliées du maestro, cela n’en demeure pas moins une étape importante dans la jeune carrière du compositeur à la fin des années 50 : le film d’Irving Lerner lui permit de s’attaquer pour la première fois au genre du thriller/polar au cinéma, genre dans lequel il deviendra une référence incontournable pour les décennies à venir. Pour Jerry Goldsmith, le challenge était double sur « City of Fear » : il fallait à la fois évoquer le suspense haletant du film sous la forme d’un compte à rebours, tout en évoquant la menace constante du cobalt-60, véritable anti-héros du film qui devient quasiment une sorte de personnage à part entière – tout en étant associé à Vince Edwards tout au long du récit. Pour Goldsmith, un premier choix s’imposa : celui de l’orchestration. Habitué à travailler pour la CBS avec des formations réduites, le maestro fit appel à un orchestre sans violons ni altos, mais avec tout un pupitre de percussions assez éclectique : xylophone, piano, marimba, harpe, cloches, vibraphone, timbales, caisse claire, glockenspiel, bongos, etc. Le pupitre des cuivres reste aussi très présent et assez imposant, tout comme celui des bois. Les cordes se résument finalement aux registres les plus graves, à travers l’utilisation quasi exclusive des violoncelles et des contrebasses. Dès les premières notes de la musique (« Get Away/Main Title »), Goldsmith établit sans équivoque une sombre atmosphère de poursuite et de danger, à travers une musique agitée, tendue et mouvementée. Alors que l’on aperçoit Ryker et son complice en train de s’échapper à toute vitesse en voiture, Goldsmith introduit une figure rythmique ascendante des cuivres, sur fond de rythmes complexes évoquant tout aussi bien Stravinsky que Bartok – deux influences majeures chez le maestro américain. On notera ici l’utilisation caractéristique du xylophone et des bongos, deux instruments qui seront très présents tout au long du score de « City of Fear », tandis que le piano renforce la tension par ses ponctuations de notes graves sur fond d’harmonies menaçantes des bois et des cuivres : une mélodie se dessine alors lentement au piccolo et au glockenspiel, et qui deviendra très rapidement le thème principal du score, thème empreint d’un certain mystère, tout en annonçant la menace à venir. C’est à partir de « Road Block » que Goldsmith introduit les sonorités associées dans le film à Ryker : on retrouve ici le jeu particulier des percussions (notes rapides de xylophone, ponctuation de piano/timbales) tandis qu’une trompette soliste fait ici son apparition, instrument rattaché dans le film à Ryker. La trompette revient dans « Motel », dans lequel les bongos créent ici un sentiment d’urgence sur fond de ponctuations de trombones et de timbales. Le morceau reflète parfaitement l’ambiance de paranoïa et de tension psychologique du film, tandis que les harmonies sombres du début sont reprises dans « The Facts », pour évoquer la menace du cobalt-60. Ce morceau permet alors à Jerry Goldsmith de développer les sonorités associées à la substance toxique dans le film (un peu comme il le fera quelques années plus tard dans le film « The Satan Bug » en 1965), par le biais de ponctuations de trompettes en sourdine, de percussion métallique et d’un raclement de guiro, évoquant judicieusement le contenant métallique du cobalt-60, que transporte Ryker tout au long du film (croyant à tort qu’il contient de la drogue). « Montage #1 » est quand à lui un premier morceau-clé de la partition de « City of Fear », car le morceau introduit les sonorités associées aux policiers qui traquent le fugitif tout au long du film. Goldsmith met ici l’accent sur un ostinato quasi guerrier de timbales agressives sur fond de cuivres en sourdine, de bois aigus et de caisse claire quasi martial : le morceau possède d’ailleurs un côté militaire assez impressionnant, évoquant les forces policières et l’urgence de la situation : stopper le fugitif à tout prix. Le réalisateur offre même une séquence de montage illustrant les préparatifs de la police pour le début de la course poursuite dans toute la ville, ce qui permet au maestro de s’exprimer pleinement en musique avec « Montage #1 ». Plus particulier, « Tennis Shoes » introduit du jazz traditionnel pour le côté « polar » du film (à noter que le pianiste du score n’est autre que le jeune John Williams !). Le morceau est associé dans le film au personnage de Pete Hallon (Sherwood Price), le gangster complice de Ryker que ce dernier finira par assassiner à la suite de plusieurs maladresses. Le motif jazzy d’Hallon revient ensuite dans « The Shoes » et « Montage #2 », qui reprend le même sentiment d’urgence que la première séquence de montage policier, avec le retour ici du motif descendant rapide de 7 notes qui introduisait le film au tout début de « Get Away/Main Title ». La mélodie principale de piccolo sur fond d’harmonies sombres de bois reviennent enfin dans « You Can’t Stay », rappelant encore une fois la menace du cobalt-60, avec une opposition étonnante ici entre le registre très aigu de la mélodie et l’extrême grave des harmonies, un élément qui renforce davantage la tension dans la musique du film. Le morceau développe ensuite le thème principal pour les dernières secondes du morceau, reprenant une bonne partie du « Main Title ». La tension monte ensuite d’un cran dans le sombre et agité « Taxicab », reprenant les ponctuations métalliques et agressives associées au cobalt-60 (avec son effet particulier du raclement de guiro cubain), tout comme le sombre « Waiting » ou l’oppressant « Search » et son écriture torturée de cordes évoquant la dégradation physique et mentale de Ryker, contaminé par le cobalt-60. « Search » permet au compositeur de mélanger les sonorités métalliques de la substance toxique, la trompette « polar » de Ryker et les harmonies sombres et torturées du « Main Title », aboutissant aux rythmes de bongos/xylophone syncopés complexes de « Track Down » et au climax brutal de « End of the Road » avec sa série de notes staccatos complexes de trompettes et contrebasses. La tension orchestrale de « End of the Road » aboutit finalement à la coda agressive de « Finale », dans lequel Goldsmith résume ses principales idées sonores/thématiques/instrumentales de sa partition en moins de 2 minutes pour la conclusion du film – on retrouve ainsi le motif descendant du « Main Title », le thème principal, le motif métallique et le raclement de guiro du cobalt-60 – un final somme toute assez sombre et élégiaque, typique de Goldsmith. Vous l’aurez certainement compris, « City of Fear » possède déjà les principaux atouts du style Jerry Goldsmith, bien plus reconnaissable ici que dans son premier essai de 1957, « Black Patch ». La musique de « City of Fear » reste d'ailleurs le meilleur élément du long-métrage un peu pauvre d'Irving Lerner : aux images sèches et peu inspirantes du film, Goldsmith répond par une musique sombre, complexe, virile, nerveuse et oppressante. Le musicien met en avant tout au long du film d’Irving Lerner une instrumentation personnelle, mélangeant les influences du XXe siècle (Stravinsky, Bartok, etc.) avec une inventivité et une modernité déconcertante - on est déjà en plein dans le style suspense du Goldsmith des années 60/70. Goldsmith fit partie à cette époque d’une nouvelle génération de musiciens qui apportèrent un point de vue différent et rafraîchissant à la musique de film hollywoodienne (Bernard Herrmann ayant déjà ouvert la voie à cette nouvelle conception) : là où un Steiner ou un Newman aurait proposé une musique purement jazzy ou même inspirée du Romantisme allemand, Goldsmith ira davantage vers la musique extra européenne tout en bousculant l’orchestre hollywoodien traditionnel et en s’affranchissant des figures rythmiques classiques, mélodiques et harmoniques du Golden Age hollywoodien. Sans être un chef-d’oeuvre dans son genre, « City of Fear » reste malgré tout un premier score majeur dans les musiques de jeunesse de Jerry Goldsmith : cette partition, pas si anecdotique qu’elle en a l’air au premier abord, servira de pont vers de futures partitions telles que « The Prize » et surtout « The Satan Bug ». « City of Fear » permit ainsi à Goldsmith de concrétiser ses idées qu’il développa tout au long de ses années à la CBS, et les amplifia sur le film d’Iriving Lerner à l’échelle cinématographique, annonçant déjà certaines de ses futures grandes musiques d’action/suspense pour les décennies à venir – les recettes du style Goldsmith sont déjà là : rythmes syncopés complexes, orchestrations inventives, développements thématiques riches, travail passionné sur la relation image/musique, etc. Voilà donc une musique rare et un peu oubliée du maestro californien, à redécouvrir rapidement grâce à l’excellente édition CD publiée par Intrada, qui contient l’intégralité des 29 minutes écrites par Goldsmith pour « City of Fear », le tout servi par un son tout à fait honorable pour un enregistrement de 1959 ! 
by Quentin Billard 24 May, 2024
Essential scores - Jerry Goldsmith
Share by: